Secular Café: Will this ultimately be good or bad for science?

Secular Café Serious discussion of science, skepticism, evolution, pseudoscience, and the paranormal

Will this ultimately be good or bad for science? Apr 11th 2012, 21:42 We have become used to the standard pattern of scientific publishing, where papers are submitted to specialist journals, are peer reviewed and either rejected or published. But there is no doubt that it's an expensive process. Of course, people have been able to publish on the net for a long time, but how can quality be maintained? http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/20...tific-journals

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions